Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Slumdog Millionaire: A Case Study

An Indian teenager who grew up in the slums of Mumbai becomes a contestant on a television game show and just happens to know all the correct answers. He is arrested on suspicion of cheating after the show closes for the night, with only one question remaining to be answered. After being brutally interrogated by the authorities, memories from his past are shown explaining how he knows the answers. He is finally able to return to the show the next night to go for the top prize: 20 million rupees. There is tremendous anticipation as he must remember the answer to one last question… This is the main plot of Slumdog Millionaire, a film that socially impacted India and the rest of the world. The film drew controversy over what was really being portrayed, and whether it accurately showed the modern culture of India.

Directed by Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire romanced audiences in 2009 with its dramatic storyline, Bollywood stylization, and inspirational “love conquers all” attitude. The main character Jamal rises above his dangerous past with the help of his brother, Salim, and childhood love, Latika. Together, they become ensnared in dangerous the dangerous grasps of Mumbai gangs, overcrowded orphanages, and possessive con artists. On the surface, this film can be assumed completely fictionalized because of the circumstances Jamal has to overcome. After researching some of the issues touched on throughout the film, it became obvious that India has some seriously troubling economic and social problems.

The problem facing India today that was found to be most disturbing is the intentional mutilation of children. In the film, Jamal and Salim are made orphans after a chaotic attack on their neighborhood kills their mother. Taking her last command, the boys run away to escape being slaughtered themselves. After a few days of living on the street, a group of older men appear to rescue the boys out of this poverty and bring them to a compound where several other children await them. The boys are given food and shelter, but the men seem to be up to something suspicious. This becomes apparent to the audience in one gruesome scene where one boy is sedated before being blinded by one of the men pouring acid over the child’s eyes. Jamal is set to be next in line, but he narrowly escapes and runs away with his brother. In a later scene, Jamal meets the blinded boy again on the street begging for money. The older men are using these children as begging props in order to gain the sympathy of passers-by and tourists. This occurs more often than most would think in real life today.

Mumbai is now India’s largest city, home to more than 20 million people. With overcrowding and a high crime rate, it is easy enough for children to become lost or stolen in the chaos. Unfortunately, the majority of these missing children fall into the wrong hands. Andrew Malone, a reporter in the UK, traveled to India to investigate the child beggar system. He was sure that it would take time and work to find children who resembled the beggars in the film. “Yet the truth, as I discovered during a chilling week-long investigation, is more disturbing than anything dreamt up by the creators of Slumdog Millionaire.”

It was not hard for Malone to find disfigured beggar children. However, finding one that would speak out and share his or her story was a difficult task. Malone finally found a young boy, Aamir, who was willing to share his story. Aamir fled to Mumbai after running away from an abusive father at the age of twelve. Within minutes of first arriving at the Victoria Station, the city’s main train terminal, he was approached by couple who gave him food. They told the boy they would take him to start a better life. Aamir said to Malone, “I thought they were maybe social workers or religious people.” Aamir’s food had been drugged. The couple took the drowsy boy to Mumbai’s municipal hospital, where a doctor was paid to amputate one of Aamir’s healthy legs. His leg was severed mid-calf, leaving him without a foot.

Most intentionally disfigured children have their arms or legs chopped off, and others have been blinded. The children with the worst injuries tend to make the most money- up to 10 Euros a day. This is a fortune in a country where the average monthly wage is less than 100 Euros (Malone). However, these children do not keep their earnings. The gang masters collect the money at the end of each day. If the children do not come back with enough expected money, they are beaten and tortured. So why don’t the children simply not return to the gang master? Most of these beggar children are addicted to solvents, alcohol, and charras (a powerful Afghan hash, often laced with opium), supplied by the gang master in order to keep the children returning. Another child beggar Malone spoke to said, “It helps us forget where we are,” after being asked about the drugs. He had his left arm removed and constantly sucks on a bag filled with glue. The boy, Tufhaar, was only nine when Malone spoke to him.

These crippled children flock to every intersection and tourist attraction. Many children are terrified of speaking out. This code of silence is understandable. “The gang members hold you down and cut out your tongue if they think you have informed,” says Flintoff, 18, a reformed local Indian gangster. Flintoff left the gang because he felt uneasy about the mistreatment of children. He says, “ I will steal every now and again, and sell drugs- but I keep away from the beggar mafia. These men are not human.” Not all “disappeared” children are disfigured or turned into beggars by these gangs. According to human rights groups, some are forced into child pornography or used as sex slaves. Others are killed and their organs are sold to wealthy Indians (Malone). Some are employed by the gangs to sell drugs. One boy Malone spoke to even offered to sell him cocaine and heroin. Slumdog Millionaire hints towards these possible outcomes for the children, but does not explicitly say so.

This seems so deplorable that it is hard to imagine it is still happening in such large numbers in this day and age. How are these children being helped? After the plight of the beggar children was thrust into the international spotlight, people took notice and decided to take action. Indian journalists decided to go undercover to see if the issue of child amputation was really as widespread as was shown in the film. Most doctor’s approached to cut off children’s healthy limbs agreed to cooperate for only 100 Euros. It was quickly found that complaints to the police are pointless. The beggar mafia bribes the corrupt officers, ensuring that no legal action will be taken. Swami Agnivesh, a child-rights activist, says: “There is collusion between the lawmakers and lawbreakers.” Because of this, people have to take action into their own hands. Several charities and advocacy groups have sprung up for this cause. Churches have set up refuge homes for these children to escape and be weaned off drugs. Other groups have started programs to shelter the children, as well. Fortunately, Aamir is one of the lucky children to have been rescued by a charity before having to beg or become addicted to drugs. The charity found him at the municipal hospital. A semi-sweet ending, as Aamir’s life will still be drastically different after having his arm unnecessarily removed.

How well is a foreign filmmaker portraying an unfamiliar culture? “It’s a white man’s imagined India,” said Shyamal Sengupta, a film professor at the Whistiling Woods International Institute in Mumbai. After Slumdog Millionaire gained widespread recognition, Indian locals and officials felt angry about what they deemed misrepresentation. “Branded as ‘poverty porn’ by some Indian critics, the film has caused controversy in a country that wants to promote itself as a modern economic super-power.” Indian police and politicians accuse Boyle’s film of painting an outdated portrait. “They are making out India is a Third World, dirty underbelly, developing nation,” says Amitah Bachchan, one of the country’s leading film stars and a powerfully patriotic voice (Malone). However, we know that many of India’s important roles are being bribed to look the other way. Nobody could possibly be in that much denial. Boyle chose Mumbai because it was an ideal backdrop. The crowded city has dangerous slums alongside upscale shops and restaurants. The diverse energy is what made the film so complex and fascinating to watch. Boyle claims he did not tamper with anything unnecessarily, that he did not want to be dishonest in representing India. He tried to make the film feel authentic by putting approximately 20% of the movie’s dialogue in Hindi (IMDB) and including real footage of Indian locals interacting with the camera.

There was controversy over the payment to the child actors actually being paid at all. The gossip going around was that the children had not been paid because they were still living in the slums of Mumbai. However, Boyle placed the money to be paid to the three lead child actors in a trust account to be released to them upon their completion of grade school. They should be 16 years of age when this happens. The production company has even set up for an auto-rickshaw driver to take the kids to school everyday until the goal is reached (IMDB). This is a huge benefit for the children.

Another benefit that came around after the film began development before the film had even been written. Indian diplomat Vikas Swarup wrote his novel “Q & A” after he was inspired by Professor Sugata Mitra’s “Hole in the Wall” experiment. This experiment set up computer kiosks in Indian slums so that anyone could use them and have access to the internet. Swarup’s novel was later adapted into the screenplay of Slumdog Millionaire. After the attention and success from the film, the Hole in the Wall Education Limited (HiWEL) was expanded, which set up 300 kiosks to be available to over 300,000 children in India and several African countries (IMDB). The program is especially beneficial because it supplies educational tools for children. The stations are set up in an outdoor setting, which children can easily access at any time. As Rahul Anand says, “The unstructured and unsupervised nature of the setting ensures that the entire process of learning is driven by a child’s curiosity” (BI). Some teachers have even reported improved retention and increased receptivity among school children. Obviously, any form of improved education can only be a good thing.

While the film did spur plenty of controversy, it is easily seen that an equally impressive amount of effort was put forth to improve on the situations in India. Danny Boyle and the entire production group have called attention to important subject matters, an admirable endeavor that needs to be remembered. And maybe, just maybe, this will inspire more filmmakers to make films that help change the world for the better. The optimistic thought is that there will always be people who care about what the world is and will become. Those people know that to do something about it today is the most important future investment.


Works Cited

Anand, Rahul. “Hole in the Wall (HiWEL)- Spreading Computer Literacy” 2010.

www.thebetterindia.com/2330/hiwel

Lee, Hiram. “The School of Hard Knocks” January 2009. WSWS.

www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jan2009/slum-j16.shtml

Magnier, Mark. “Indians Don’t Feel Good About ‘Slumdog Millionaire’” January

2009. www.articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/24/world/fg-india-slumdog24

Malone, Andrew. “The Real Slumdog Millionaires: Behind The Cinema Fantasy,

Mafia Gangs Are Deliberately Crippling Children For Profit” January 2009.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1127056

Monday, April 11, 2011

Short and Skype



Hello bloggerfollowers!

In class this week we learned about the great works of Peter Glantz! Don't know him? Well, lucky for you he has a website. http://www.imaginarycompany.org/ We actually visited this website in order to get a better idea of his work. I'm posting the videos because I know some people missed class and would probably love to experience what we missed:)

The first thing we looked at was some animated shorts that Peter directed inspired by texts that he and his friend Becky started sending to each other. The first, Change your relationship to nature.


This short looked like someone took a children's book and animated two pages of it. With that in mind, it also seems like a short that would be used in a children's program on television. It's very simple, but positive. I think it's funny that it looks like it was made from a children's book because it has a print that goes with it.

The second short in the 'inspirational text' series is was "Your Heart is a Prism"


This short reminded me of 80's/90's television shows for kids. It just seems to have that rough artistic and psychedelic feel to it. I couldn't help but think of the show CareBears. I kind of wonder what exactly they want the response to be for these videos and if that is the effect received. I just have flashbacks to shows I watched when I was four.

The next piece was a music video titled, "I want to see you go wild."


When we first clicked play I was pretty excited to see the video. The beginning seemed really cool. I loved when the hands punched through the wall and played the piano! I started to loose the enthusiasm when the artist jumped through, but that's mainly because it's not my type of music and I'm not too into blood. Overall, I thought the music video was really effective because I liked the way the animations and the singer intermingled. The animations reminded me of cartoons you would see on Nickelodeon (Doug, Real Monsters).

We also watched a section of his performance. There was this big beast like statue with eyes that talked. You can find other videos of his performance on his site. When I went back to his site to remind myself what we watched I saw another music video he did. It was Madonna's "Like a Prayer" performed by Lavender Diamond.


I think the look of animation and real people looks pretty cool. The beginning was like a blank coloring book. What amused me while watching this video was that the prism heart came back! When Lavender says "home" an animated heart comes out of her chest and you see the faded prism light coming out of it. This whole video I was thinking "oh, the genius of green screen."

When I was watching the previous video something on the "suggestions" column of youtube caught my eye. A video of Zoey Deschanel and Becky Stark. The same Becky that Peter works with? I think so. I added the clip for your viewing pleasure.


Enough videos. We decided to do something brand new and exciting in our class. Skype with Peter! We had some trouble with sound, but I was happy to amuse our guest with a little song and dance, which he responded back by dancing around in a green mask. I think we'd get along great.

So skype with Peter. We each had to ask at least one question. Here are a few things I remember:

What tips do you have for film hopefuls that are moving to NY or LA.
Peter responded by telling a story of his own life. When he moved he went to a person that he really liked the work of. That day he was paid to write a few treatments for 300$ and by the next few weeks he was hired. His advice? Seek out companies or places that you like the work of and get connected.

There was a question about the difference between performance and film.
Mr. Glantz responded that he tries to make his videos incorporate the feelings one gets from live performances.

There was a question of how it is to work from his home town.
Peter said that through the use of the internet, phone, and Skype, he has been able to do projects with people all around the country. He hired on his friend Becky, even though she doesn't live by him, because working in different places is easier now with our technology.

We only had a few minutes before he had to go so I shouted out a question that I was curious about.

Me to PG: What inspires you?
To boil down PG's answer to it's simplest form, Peter said the earth and the air inspire him. I loved that answer because I feel the same. Life and love are definitely at the top of my list (which he also stated) and I feel our hippie like inspirations go quite well together.


Since I went so far into depth on Peter Glantz, I'm just going to talk a little about the Barber of
Birmingham. I LOVED the short. Maybe it's because I find elderly men adorable and fascinating, but also because this man fought for something he believed in.

Even though the film was short it was incredibly powerful. I loved how they combined history with the life story of this fantastic man. The whole time I was thinking "I should send him the print of Martin Luther King that J. Zielinski took!" I was sad to see that both he had already passed away. The film was dedicated to him and the co-director Gail, who also died.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Siding and Films that Affect Us All

So we watched Blue Vinyl in class the other day and have been taking a look at Judith Helfand and her recent works and past work with Chicken and Egg productions.
My mother the other day told me she was thinking of residing their beautifully wood paneled house, I immediately jumped on the NO VINYL SIDING wagon and told her what I had learned, she was like "oh ok, I think your stepdad prefers aluminum any ways" but I was still wondering about aluminum. But while doing research on Blue Vinyl the movie I was surprised to find that the 31 factory owners in Italy were acquitted as opposed to having to suffer for their actions against people and the city of Venice.

In researching Judith and Working Films I came across more films that interested me, looked on Netflix and decided to watch a few. There is this film called No Impact Man that is based on this man and his families journey throughout a year with limiting their impact on the world. The reduce their carbon print, their electric use, their trash output, and their consumerism. It was an interesting film and I can see why Judith would choose to represent a film like that with her company. It had an impact on me, an has made me examine some things I need to change about my lifestyle. I think the main discussion in most of Judith's films that she makes and also represents seems to be, if you preach it then do it. It's the whole "We need to save the planet from global warming, but hold on let me just drive to the grocery store for a tomato in december." when we could all use a little local, plastic free, carbon energy free in our lives.

something else that I have learned about Judith has made me realize in the process that I have seen quite a bit of movies helped by Chicken and Egg and other companies she works with. Such as Freeheld, Walk into The Sea, and The Barber of Birmingham.

To sort of make a side note. I took a look at the Story of Stuff and the moment I went to the website I already knew everything about it. About 2 years ago or so I saw it on the interwebs and decided to take a look, it feels pretty awesome when you can look at yourself and see that the films you like to watch on your own time are films that teach you and make you look at the world with a perspective of change. The research I have been doing for the past few days about Judith and the productions she is involved in makes me happy and proud to be a future member of the documentary world.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Dangerous Business

Judith Helfand's wonderfully quirky documentary, Blue Vinyl, gave us an inside look at the vinyl industry and just what goes into making it. What I really enjoyed was that the film starts out with a woman who presumes to know nothing about the subject. She becomes interested when her parents re-side their house with vinyl and decides to look more closely at what her parents had no problem with using. We find, however, that this is simply because vinyl is cheap. The price is what persuades most families to use it, forgetting the dangerous possibilities that arrive with it. Even Helfand's own father said that he probably still would have used the siding, even after seeing his daughter's research. For him, it all comes down to the price. If Helfand hadn't paid for the new wood siding, would her parent's house still have vinyl siding? Probably so.

Helfand begins by looking at what goes into making vinyl. Vinyl is made up of dangerous chemicals that are particularly toxic when burned. Health is a large concern for Helfand, as she underwent a hysterectomy at a young age because of a dangerous substance that caused cancer in her family. So naturally, Helfand is just a little curious as to what the toxic effects of bio-hazardous chemicals in vinyl would be. If vinyl were to burn, the toxic chemical smoke that would escape during the process would do the most damage. A person exposed to the smoke could easily die if in contact for long enough, and most definitely be plagued with health problems if a for a shorter amount of time. Helfand is especially concerned when she realizes that, if this were to happen to her parent's house, the neighbors would suffer as well.

Hefland takes her camera, along with a piece of blue vinyl siding, along with her as she sets out to get to the bottom of the industry. She travels to Louisiana, California, and even Italy to find out what goes into vinyl. It was especially shocking to me that one of the largest producing plants is in Italy, just beyond Venice's classic skyline. It is sad to see a place that is thought so often to be cultural and untouchable by modern influences overcome by a chemically toxic production plant. What is even worse is to see the health effects the chemicals have on the employees. There are several touching personal stories throughout the film that are meant to show the real consequences of the industry. Widows, daughters, sons, and friends speak to Helfand about losing a loved one only to be hushed by the production company in order to keep bad press away.

More recently, however, it has been difficult to keep bad press away from the vinyl producers. On the PVC-free website as well as several other sites dedicated to ridding the world of vinyl, there are articles and examples of people who have realized the dangers involved and want to change that. Companies like Toys R Us are trying to phase out PVC products and bring in safer options. This seems especially important in places that sell products for children. Why would we give our kids toxic pieces of plastic to chew on?

When Helfand finally re-sides her parent's house with wood, she is unsure of what to do with the vinyl siding that was taken down. This is a real problem because there is no safe way to dispose of vinyl products. It can't really be recycled because there are too many toxic chemicals involved to separate them and make a new, safe product. Most vinyl goes into landfills, which is just as destructive because the chemicals can leach out into the ground and infiltrate drinking water or soil where food is grown. Helfand is not satisfied with either of these options, and decided to take a more creative, campaign stand on the issue. The last scene of the film involves Helfand and her parents stringing the squares of blue vinyl onto Mardi Gras beads. Upon a closer look, the vinyl squares have been equipped with a sticker that informs people on the dangers of vinyl and asks them to not throw the pieces away. While this is a very effective and creative tool for the the promotion of the film and its purpose, it also leaves an open ending. What are people to do with their own discarded vinyl products? I guess that is the point of the film... to make people realize that there is no good way to safely recycle vinyl. So why keep making a product that cannot be reused?




Even though Helfand seems very approachable and like a normal person, we can tell she had money set up to do this project. At least she does finally explain in the end that she used her "uterus money", or money she received in the settlement against the drug company, to fund the film. Without this, would her film have been able to travel such great distances and achieve so much? For women filmmakers who may not have "uterus money" available to them, Helfand has set up a wonderful organization called Chicken & Egg Pictures. This is a non-profit production company available to women filmmakers who need funding for a social justice or human interest film project. The best part about it is that the organization not only gives monetary support, but emotional support and mentorship, as well. Who could ask for more?

Now That's Power

It’s amazing how we many environmentally harmful things we come into contact with everyday without even knowing it. The siding on houses, the chemicals we put in our cars, the plastics we give our children, and the batteries we put in our remotes, all come from a process that is environmentally harmful, and continue to be harmful. We as consumers, however, are unaware of this because we companies have done a great job keeping the harms under wraps, and most of us are too busy with our daily lives to research every little man made thing we come into contact with. If we don’t see something bad happening right in front of our eyes, we simply go on about our normal lives, ignoring all the things that could happen in the future, or more depressingly, all the people that were harmed in them making of the products we use.

Judith Helfand is not one of these consumers, however. She spends her time making films and supporting other filmmakers that attempt to educate and change the way people think about the things they come into contact with everyday. Her film “Blue Vinyl”, for example, is one that points out the problems of PVC as well as highlights all the places it pops up in our daily lives. Some places that vinyl appears include the siding on our houses, medical equipment, and even toys for children.

As I was watching the film and learning about all the environmentally and healthy damaging chemicals that were involved in the making of PVC, I wondered if it was really a good idea to give products made from that to children. When I looked at the “Blue Vinyl” website, I found out this really isn’t such a great idea. According to the website “although soft PVC have been made for babies for years, studies find that these additives leach out of soft toys and into the mouths of the children chewing on them.” Babies and young children put EVERYTHING in their mouths, so it doesn’t make a lot of sense to give them hazardous materials to chew on, and as the website points out, toxins from the plastics are getting into their bodies. It doesn’t stop with the toys however, “ vinyl IV bags used in neo-natal intensive care units have also been shown to leach DEHP, a phthatlate additive”. Dioxins released from both the making and burning of PVC are also being passed to children through breast milk. Luckily some progress is being made to change things, because “in Europe, phthatlate additives in PVC toys for children under the age of three have been banned and in the USA, most companies have voluntarily stopped manufacturing PVC for this age group or have eliminated the phthalates.” These are small steps, but they are a start.

Unfortunately, Vinyl products show up in other places in our daily lives. According the “Blue Vinyl” website, “brand new shower curtains, car interiors, and flooring” are all vinyl products that release chemical gases into the air. These gases have the potential to be hazardous to both adults and children, and yet they exists as part of our everyday lives.

Vinyl is not only hazardous during its creation or use, it is also impossible to find a non-harmful disposal of the product. Recycling Vinyl is complicated because, according to the “Blue Vinyl” website, “there are countless varieties of additives in different vinyl products, the recycler is faced with the headache of mixing too many unknown chemicals together and not being able to control the final content of the recycled product. Because of the variety of PVC ingredients in different products, PVC – when recycled – ends up being used to make cheap, low quality products.” Since there are so many different ways to manipulate the plastic on a chemical level, it is hard to actually recycle it, and therefore most places end up creating more potentially harmful vinyl products to put back into the hands of consumers at a cheaper price. On top of this, recycling vinyl is also tricky because, according to the “Blue Vinyl” website, “if even a small amount of PVC mistakenly finds its way into a non-chlorine based plastic recycling process, the hydrogen chloride can contaminate the entire batch of recyclables, damage the equipment and make it unfit for recycling.” Therefore the process gets even more complex because recycling of other materials can be hindered by PVC as well.

Burning PVC is considered by a lot of people to be another alternative for disposal, but it seems to have just as many draw backs, if not more. Burning PVC releases dioxins into the air, which according to www.myhouseisyourhouse.org, “as a persistent bioaccumulative toxin (PBT), [dioxins] do not breakdown rapidly and travel around the globe, accumulating in fatty tissue and concentrating as it goes up the food chain. Dioxins from Louisiana manufacturing plants migrate on the winds and concentrate in the Great Lakes fish. Dioxins are even found in hazardous concentration in the tissues of whales and arctic polar bears”. These dioxins are destroying the health of both people and animals around the globe. They are not concentrated in one area, and effect more than the one person or group who decided to burn them, which makes the way they choose to dispose of their PVC the concern of everyone.

Luckily there are groups providing resources for people to live lives that are not dependant on polluting the environment through the use of PVC. There are alternatives to using vinyl in for construction, as pointed out in “Blue Vinyl” that include stucco, recycled wood, and straw, as well as alternatives to using it in our everyday lives. The website www.besafenet.com offers alternative options to vinyl when shopping for everything from school supplies to electronics. These options may not completely eliminate the use of vinyl in your everyday life, but they can drastically reduce it.

There are also filmmaking companies that have been established to encourage films like “Blue Vinyl” that attempt to make the world a better place to live, that offer funding to filmmakers who can make a film about a subject and then combine it with an online effort to further educate people. Companies like Judith Helfand’s Chicken and Egg Pictures and Working Films offers monetary and social support to filmmakers trying to make a difference. The Chicken and Egg Pictures website describes their driving force best when it says “we operate from a basic belief that people respond to stories, not issues”. “Blue Vinyl”, just like many other films, would not have been as powerful without the personal story that accompanied the issue, and the humanity provided by the filmmaker through voice over and on screen prescience as well as complete honesty. All it takes is one squeaky wheel to make a difference, and film is the perfect vehicle for a squeaky wheel.

Vinyl's Slippery Slope

There is no doubt that Judith Helfand is a strong, impassioned woman as she parades her section of blue vinyl around for 6 + years like it's a badge of honor. The catalyst moment in her 2002 documentary, Blue Vinyl occurs when her parents reside the rotting wood paneling on their humble abode with the ever cheap siding selection: vinyl. Curious as to how this product is manufactured and disposed of, Judith delves into a bit of research, only to unveil a dark, seemingly endless trail of evidence showing the dangerous toxins vinyl siding causes. Having a hysterectomy at age 25 from harmful toxins given to her mother during pregnancy, Judith becomes concerned for the health of not only her parents, but their neighbors. With her constant blue vinyl companion, Judith sets out to find a more environmentally friendly siding option for her parents.

When question the film poses is: Can vinyl really be done away with? Even after people are told of the threats vinyl siding inflict upon the environment and its inhabitants, they are not so easily persuaded to seek safer options. Take Judith's parents, for example. Midway into the film, her father states that despite the evidence she has placed before him, he still sees the vinyl siding as a cost efficient option and stands by his initial decision to use it on his home.

Its cost efficiency puts it in the good graces of many, especially those who cannot afford to procure their own home. The film touches base on this as we see a team of vinyl workers assemble a house and garage for a working class family. For this particular family, and many others in their same situation, shelter takes priority over environmental concerns.

In my own experience, vinyl siding is found on almost any form of affordable student housing: duplexes, apartment complexes, condominiums, etc. These houses aren't built for efficiency. They are built cheap so their residents can live cheap. Judith even admits that the only way she could afford to reside her parent's house was through the use of her settlement funds she gained through the hysterectomy.

It's a slippery slope that opens a new can of worms at every turn.

The spunk of Judith Helfand


This week's unit was centered around a fantastically courageous woman named Judith Helfand. I had first seen/heard of this woman while attending the Citizen Jane Film Festival. She was both a guest and a panelist. My first impression was "man, this woman is really hard core." I didn't know the half of it. Our class watched the film Blue Vinyl and it was then that I realized just how truly persistent she is. I gained a lot of respect for her this week and enjoyed what she's created so far:)

Our blog this week is not only to talk about Judith Helfand and Blue Vinyl, to also visit other sites that she may be associated with as well. I looked up the eight sites we were given earlier on this blog and decided to comment on each one.

BARBER OF BIRMINGHAM

The thing that really pulled me in when clicking onto the Barber of Birmungham site was the wonderful photographs. The photo seen is an adorable elderly black man fixing his tie. This intrigued me enough to go straight to the trailer.

The worse thing a man can do is nothing." That is a quote from the main character in the trailer. All the walls of his barber shop have pictures of people that have "done something." I realized how this was connected to this weeks unit when the trailer went on with the text "Chicken and Egg Pictures presents." The film seems like an incredibly inspiring story. What's more inspiring to a filmmaker than two woman going out and creating a film?
BLUE VINYL OFFICIAL SITE

Ahhhh, the Blue Vinyl site. I was really curious to see what this site would have. Would it have details of her argument with her parents about vinyl? Options to help defeat the companies that use pvc? What?

It was an interestingly simple site for the mass amount of work that was involved in actually creating the film. I kind of wish there was a trailer because the text was a little overwhelming and I feel if I knew nothing of the movie I would be turned off by the site. If there was a trailer I think more people would be intrigued.

MY HOUSE IS YOUR HOUSE

I actually visited all of these sites out of the order that was originally typed up. This site was the last site I visited and I found that parts of the other sites were mixed into this one as well. I saw the picture of the beads that were on Judith's site, the Sam Suds cartoon from the pvc site, and even the logo that is found throughout the working films site.

I flipped through all of the tabs and found a lot of text. Much like the Blue Vinyl site, I wished there pictures or videos to stimulate interest. There was, however, an easily found list that stated the dangers of PVC.

• Cancer
• Endometriosis
• Neurological damage
• Immune system damage
• Respiratory problems
• Liver and kidney failure
• Birth defects
-http://www.myhouseisyourhouse.org/


BLUE VINYL AND WORKING FILMS

Working Films primary goal is to create films that make an impact. I could tell just by looking at the statement on their "about us" page:
"Working Films linking nonfiction film to cutting edge activism.

Working Films leverages the power of storytelling through documentary film to advance struggles for social, economic, and environmental justice, human and civil rights. With offices in the U.S. and London, we offer consultation, strategic planning for alternative distribution, website and social media development, and complete campaign management services to filmmakers to ensure the content of nonfiction media truly meets the intention for change.

Additionally, we support the communication needs of nonprofit organizations and others working for social change, providing media strategy and access to our dynamic portfolio of film-based resources that can extend the reach to, and engagement of, supporters, opinion leaders, decision makers, and other key audiences critical in advancing the issues that matter most. "
-workingfilms.org
This site was completely stuffed full of films and projects associated. Here are a list of topics that are present.
  • Economic Justice
  • Environmental Justice (Blue Vinyl was listed here)
  • Gender and Sexuality
  • Global issues
  • Health and Ability
  • Human Rights
  • Race and Ethnicity
This would be such an interesting organization to work for. Not only because it would mean taking part in trying to create change, but also because I could see all the passionate filmmakers that want to make a difference in the world. I have a feeling I could spend all day going through the film titles and watching the trailers.

PVC: THE POISON PLASTIC
The first thing I did when going on the pvcfree site was watch the little cartoon. I thought it was clever. Having been in the film department and learning about the film noir style made me appreciate the quirky little cartoon. The thing that astonished me was that pvc was in so many things? The list that Sam Suds holds up has things like shampoo bottles on it!

When clicking the 'home' tab I found that Toys R' Us uses pvc plastic. AHHH!!! It is interesting that something so dangerous is casually chewed on by our kids without any of us really being aware. The funny thing is that after looking at this site I went all around my boyfriend's apartment and looked on the bottom of every plastic product to see if I would find the disastrous 3. Thankfully, I didn't find any, but I will be a lot more casual when shopping from now on.
Toys r us
looked at all my plastics afterwards for a 3

JUDITH HELFAND'S SITE
I went to www.judithhelfand.com and saw many pictures that I recognized from the film Blue Vinyl. There was the bead necklaces with bits of the vinyl that covered her home. There was a picture of her parents making the necklaces. I don't think that the site had been updated lately because the latest in the news feed was about a mother's day broadcast that took place in 2007. It was at this site that I saw that Judith's dad had died.

I went through all the sections of the site; films, news, workshops&speaking engagements, collaborations, bio, blog, and contact. I found the "films" section the most interesting because it was there that I was able to see the other issues she focused on when making films.

There were five of her films listed. The Uprising of '34(1995(, Everything's Cool(2007), EK Velt: At the end of the World(2004), Blue Vinyl(2002), and A Healthy Baby Girl (1997). Her topics are the dangers of PVC, global warming, cotton mill strike, and her family/personal experience with cancer. I found the idea of A Healthy Baby Girl the most interesting because it is a video diary shot over five years. It would be interesting to go deep into her life to see what events made her the strong woman she is today.


CHICKEN AND EGG

I actually looked at this site first because I've been hearing so much about it lately. I went to the "business of film" panel and Judith was one of the members there. I wish I had been able to see her work and know her background before the panel because I think I would have beeb able to appreciate the panel more as well as ask better questions.

Moving on... I liked the mission statement on the website so I decided to add it to the blog for those of you who forgot or haven't seen it can refresh.

"Chicken & Egg Pictures is a hybrid film fund and non-profit production company dedicated to supporting women filmmakers who are as passionate about the craft of storytelling as they are about the social justice, environmental and human rights issues they’re embracing, translating and exploring on film.

We match strategically timed financial support with rigorous, respectful and dynamic mentorship, creative collaboration and community-building to nurture women filmmakers whose diverse voices represent a range of lived experience and realities that have the power to change the world as we know it."

-http://www.chickeneggpics.org/

There was a video on the home page that had some examples of films associated with Chicken and egg. After each clip there were statements to how each film effected society. I wanted to watch all of them! These are the examples of films that were on the homepage.
  • Lioness- America's first generation of female combat veterans
  • 34x25x36- The perfect body/ideal woman
  • Freechild- A detective fights for her right to leave her pension to the woman she loved
After watching the homepage clip I went on to look at the other films associated with Chicken and Egg pictures. The first film to catch my eye (big surprise) was Orgasm inc.


I had heard of this film, but had never seen the trailer. I cozied up in the big black office chair and clicked play. The film sounded fascinating. Orgasm Inc. is about the marketing campaigns that all advertise in assisting women to orgasm.

This was a very fascinating web search. I actually kind of liked it more than the usual packets we get. Not only because we save trees, but because it's fun to branch off and search for the topics I found interesting as well as having the ability to fully see the visual images and watch the trailers.

Until next week!